Best ChatGPT Prompts for Lawyers

ChatGPT is an AI chatbot that can automate and streamline certain legal tasks. It has the potential to assist lawyers with legal research, drafting documents like contracts or letters, reviewing agreements, answering client FAQs, and generating marketing content.

Some effective prompts for lawyers include asking ChatGPT to summarize a case or law, draft specific legal documents, explain legal concepts in plain language, and suggest arguments for a legal case.

ChatGPT can help lawyers save time on repetitive tasks, provide better service to clients, and free up capacity to focus on high-value legal work. However, its outputs should always be reviewed for accuracy. Human oversight is still required when using AI like ChatGPT in the legal field.

101 of the Best ChatGPT Prompts for Lawyers

101 ChatGPT Prompts for Lawyers

Use Cases of ChatGPT for Lawyers

ChatGPT is a chatbot that uses generative artificial intelligence (AI) to answer questions, write texts, and perform tasks based on text inputs. It was launched by OpenAI in November 2022 and has been used for various purposes, such as writing songs, cover letters, recipes, and even wills.

Lawyers can leverage ChatGPT to increase their productivity and stay competitive in several ways. For example, they can use ChatGPT to:

  • Research and write legal documents faster and more efficiently using ChatGPT’s ability to generate natural language texts from templates and precedents.
  • Summarize complex legal concepts and cases in plain language for clients or colleagues using ChatGPT’s ability to simplify and paraphrase texts.
  • Answer common legal questions and provide general legal information using ChatGPT’s ability to access large datasets and respond to queries.
  • Automate legal tasks such as contract drafting, conveyancing, or license generation using ChatGPT’s ability to complete tasks based on text inputs.

However, lawyers should also be aware of the limitations and risks of using ChatGPT. For instance, they should:

  • Please verify the accuracy and reliability of ChatGPT’s outputs by checking the sources and references used by ChatGPT and comparing them with authoritative legal sources.
  • Avoid using ChatGPT for high-precision or complex legal matters that require human judgment, creativity, or expertise by consulting with professional lawyers or experts when needed.
  • Be mindful of the ethical and legal implications of using ChatGPT for legal assistance, such as the potential for plagiarism, confidentiality breaches, or unauthorized practice of law by following the relevant codes of conduct and regulations in their jurisdiction.

ChatGPT is a powerful tool that can help lawyers with various aspects of their work, but it is not a substitute for a professional lawyer. Lawyers should use ChatGPT with caution and discretion and always seek human guidance when necessary.

Here are some examples of ChatGPT prompts and their responses that lawyers can use to increase productivity and efficiency.

ChatGPT can assist lawyers in quickly researching legal cases and statutes by providing relevant information and insights and even analyzing case outcomes within seconds. This allows lawyers to better understand precedent and devise effective strategies.

“Provide a detailed summary of the holding and rationale of the landmark legal case [legal case name], focusing on the court’s interpretation of key legal principles and reasoning. Analyze how this case has significantly impacted the development of [specific area of law] by discussing relevant subsequent cases, modifications to legal doctrines, or changes in legislation that can be traced back to this case. Additionally, explore any challenges or critiques raised by legal scholars regarding the court’s decision and its implications for the future of [specific area of law].”

“Provide a detailed summary of the holding and rationale of the landmark legal case Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka, 347 U.S. 483 (1954), focusing on the court’s interpretation of key legal principles and its reasoning. Analyze how this case has significantly impacted the development of civil rights and education law by discussing relevant subsequent cases, modifications to legal doctrines, or changes in legislation that can be traced back to this case. Additionally, explore any challenges or critiques raised by legal scholars regarding the court’s decision and its implications for the future of civil rights and education law.”

ChatGPT Response:

Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka, 347 U.S. 483 (1954), is a landmark United States Supreme Court case that declared state laws establishing separate public schools for black and white students unconstitutional. The decision overturned the “separate but equal” doctrine established by the 1896 case Plessy v. Ferguson, which had upheld racial segregation in public facilities.

Holding and Rationale:

The Court held that racial segregation in public schools violated the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. The unanimous decision, delivered by Chief Justice Earl Warren, reasoned that the separation of students based on race created…

Impact on Civil Rights and Education Law:

Brown v. Board of Education had a profound impact on civil rights and education law in the United States. Some of the key developments include…

Challenges and Critiques:

Despite its significance, Brown v. Board of Education has faced challenges and critiques from legal scholars…

In conclusion…

ChatGPT-4 by OpenAI
chatgpt legal research prompt

Lawyers can use ChatGPT prompts to efficiently draft various legal documents, such as contracts, wills, power of attorney forms, and correspondence with opposing counsel or clients. This saves time and effort in the document preparation process.

“Draft a settlement agreement between [party 1] and [party 2] involving [specific legal issue] with the following terms: [list key terms] in [jurisdiction].

Draft a settlement agreement between Apple Inc. (Party 1) and Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. (Party 2) involving intellectual property and patent infringement disputes with the following terms: (1) mutual release of claims, (2) cross-licensing of patents, (3) payment of financial compensation, and (4) confidentiality provisions, in the jurisdiction of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California.

ChatGPT Response:

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT

This Settlement Agreement (the “Agreement”) is entered into as of [Date], by and between Apple Inc., a California corporation with its principal place of business at 1 Apple Park Way, Cupertino, CA 95014 (“Party 1”) and Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., a corporation organized under the laws of South Korea, with its principal place of business at 129 Samsung-ro, Yeongtong-gu, Suwon-si, Gyeonggi-do, South Korea (“Party 2”) (collectively, the “Parties”).

WHEREAS, the Parties are involved in ongoing intellectual property and patent infringement disputes before the United States District Court for the Northern District of California (the “Court”);

WHEREAS, the Parties desire to fully and finally resolve…

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises and covenants contained herein…

Mutual Release of Claims.

(a) Party 1, on behalf of itself and its subsidiaries, affiliates…

ChatGPT-4 by OpenAI
chatgpt prompt for drafting legal documents

Lawyers often face a range of client questions, from basic legal information to complex legal issues. To effectively and efficiently assist clients, lawyers can use ChatGPT prompts to help answer these questions or provide guidance on possible legal options.

“Explain the steps and requirements for [client’s name] to initiate a [specific legal action] in [jurisdiction].

Example Legal Advice Prompt:

“Outline the requirements for the United States v. Microsoft Corp. to initiate an antitrust lawsuit in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia. Cover pre-filing requirements, key documentation, deadlines, and legal claim elements. Include strategies and tips for effective case management.”

ChatGPT Response:

Antitrust lawsuits in the United States are governed by the Sherman Act, which prohibits certain business activities that undermine competition in the marketplace. To initiate an antitrust lawsuit against Microsoft Corp. in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, the following requirements must be met:

Pre-filing requirements:

Standing: The plaintiff must have legal standing, which means that they have suffered an injury as a result of Microsoft’s anticompetitive behavior…

Key documentation:

Complaint: The complaint should contain a statement of facts that alleges the antitrust violations committed by Microsoft…

Deadlines:

Filing deadline: The complaint must be filed within the statute of limitations period…

Legal claim elements:

Monopoly power: The plaintiff must prove that Microsoft has monopoly power in a relevant market…

Strategies and tips for effective case management:

Develop a clear strategy: Develop a clear strategy for the case and communicate it to the client and the team.

Use technology: Use technology to organize and manage the large volume of documents and information involved in the case.

Expert witness preparation: Work closely with expert witnesses to prepare them for testimony.

Trial preparation: Prepare for trial early, including developing trial themes and identifying potential weaknesses in the case.

Settlement negotiations: Consider settlement negotiations at various stages of the case, including before and after discovery.

ChatGPT-4 by OpenAI
provide legal advice chatgpt prompt

Lawyers can use ChatGPT to draft customized legal forms and waivers, such as liability waivers, demand letters, and consent forms, without creating them from scratch or relying on generic templates.

“Create a non-disclosure agreement for [business name] to protect its [specific type of information] with the following key provisions: [list key provisions].

Example Legal Advice Prompt:

“Create a non-disclosure agreement for Acme Corp to protect its proprietary software source code with the following key provisions:

  • Definition of Confidential Information
  • Obligations of the Receiving Party
  • Exclusions from Confidentiality
  • Return or Destruction of Confidential Information
  • Non-Solicitation of Employees
  • Term and Termination
  • Remedies for Breach
  • Governing Law and Jurisdiction

ChatGPT Response:

NON-DISCLOSURE AGREEMENT

This Non-Disclosure Agreement (“Agreement”) is made and entered into on the date of acceptance by the Receiving Party (as defined below) of the terms and conditions of this Agreement by and between Acme Corp, a company organized under the laws of [insert jurisdiction] with its principal place of business at [insert address] (“Disclosing Party”), and the party accepting the terms of this Agreement (“Receiving Party”).

ChatGPT-4 by OpenAI
chatgpt non disclosure prompt

Contract Review and Analysis

Lawyers can use ChatGPT to review contracts and provide insights into essential terms and conditions without spending hours reading through complex legal language. This can help them identify potential issues or areas for negotiation more efficiently.

Contract Review and Analysis Prompt: 

“Analyze the attached contract between [party 1] and [party 2], focusing on the five most important clauses, their potential risks, and suggested revisions: [copy and paste contract].”

Example Contract Review Prompt:

Analyze the attached contract between Elon Musk and OpenAI, focusing on the five most essential clauses, their potential risks, and suggested revisions: [copy and paste contract here]

ChatGPT Response:

Analysis:

The contract agreement between Elon Musk and OpenAI covers essential aspects of their collaboration in artificial intelligence. Here are the five most critical clauses, their potential risks, and suggested revisions:

Engagement: OpenAI agrees to provide consulting services to Musk in the field of artificial intelligence. Such services may include but are not limited to, research and development of artificial intelligence technology, advice on investments in the field of artificial intelligence, and other related services as mutually agreed upon by the parties.

Potential Risks: The clause is too broad and lacks specificity on the scope and nature of the services to be provided by OpenAI. It may lead to disputes regarding the services’ quality, quantity, and timing.

Suggested Revisions: The clause should specify the scope, nature, and deliverables of the consulting services to be provided by OpenAI. It should also outline the criteria for evaluating the performance and results of the services.

Legal firms can best leverage ChatGPT prompts by creating an internal resource for prompts they know to be effective. By creating an internal ChatGPT prompt resource, lawyers can go beyond just using AI to improve their productivity, saving their entire firm time and effort in their daily tasks. Law is an industry in which the advent of GPT-4 will profoundly impact. We are yet to see the effects of ChatGPT on the legal sector as AI is still in its infancy, and therefore, the impact on jobs remains to be seen. 

For most lawyers, using AI tools will allow them to devote more time to the essential aspects of their work. Lawyers can focus on the areas AI cannot, such as strategy and client relationships. Additionally, lawyers can use ChatGPT to improve the quality of their work, as it provides relevant information and insights to support their decision-making process.

Benefits of Creating an Internal ChatGPT Prompt Resource

ChatGPT prompts are text inputs that instruct ChatGPT to perform a particular task or generate a specific output. The quality and effectiveness of the prompts depend on several factors, such as the clarity, specificity, and relevance of the instructions, the availability and reliability of the data sources, and the complexity and difficulty of the task.

Here are some examples of ChatGPT prompts for achieving what I have outlined in my previous answer. Please note that these are hypothetical and illustrative examples only, and they may not work as expected in every situation. You should always verify and edit the outputs of ChatGPT before using them for any legal purpose.

50 ChatGPT Prompts Being Used by Lawyers

  1. Draft a Contract for the Client

Prompt: Please draft a [contract type] for [client name] based on the terms discussed during the consultation. Ensure to include all necessary provisions and review for accuracy before sending for signature.

  1. Conduct Legal Research and Analysis

Prompt: Conduct legal research on [legal issue or topic] and summarise relevant case law, statutes, and regulations. Please provide your analysis and conclusions based on your research.

  1. Proofread Legal Document

Prompt: Proofread the [legal document type] for [client name] for grammar, punctuation, and formatting errors. Please make any necessary edits and ensure the document is error-free before sending it to the client.

  1. Review Document for Relevancy and Privilege

Prompt: Review [document type] for [client name] for relevancy and privilege in discovery. Please provide a summary of your findings and any recommendations for further action.

  1. Analyze Contract for Compliance

Prompt: Analyze the [contract type] for [client name] for compliance with applicable laws and regulations. Please provide a summary of any potential issues and recommendations for revisions.

  1. Draft Specific Clause for Contract

Prompt: Draft the [specific clause or provision] for [contract type] between [party 1] and [part 2]. Please ensure the language is clear and concise and complies with applicable laws and regulations.

  1. Provide Summary of Relevant Case Law

Prompt: Provide a concise summary of relevant case law for [legal issue or topic] in a memorandum for [client name]. Please make sure to include all necessary citations and analyses.

  1. Identify Relevant Precedents

Prompt: Identify relevant precedents to support legal arguments in [legal document type] for [client name]. Please provide a summary of your findings and any recommendations for further action.

  1. Interpret and Apply Specific Statutes

Prompt: Interpret and apply [specific statute] to [legal situation] for [client name]. Please provide a summary of your analysis and conclusions.

  1. Fact-check Legal Document

Prompt: Fact-check the [legal document type] for [client name] for accuracy of facts and figures. Please make any necessary corrections before sending it to the client.

  1. Ensure Proper Citation Format

Prompt: Ensure proper citation format and accuracy in the [legal document type] for [client name]. Please review for any errors and make necessary corrections.

  1. Draft Legal Memorandum

Prompt: Draft a memorandum on [specific legal issue] for internal use at [company name]. Please provide a thorough analysis and recommendations.

  1. Create a Legal Document Template

Prompt: Create a template for [specific legal document type] for frequent use at [company name]. Please ensure the document is user-friendly and complies with applicable laws and regulations.

  1. Compare and Contrast Legal Documents

Prompt: Compare and contrast different versions of a [legal document type] and highlight any changes for [client name]. Please provide a summary of your findings and any recommendations for further action.

  1. Draft Legal Correspondence

Prompt: Draft a letter to [opposing counsel/client/court] for [client name] regarding [specific legal issue]. Please ensure the language is professional and complies with applicable laws and regulations.

  1. Identify Potential Conflicts of Interest

Prompt: Identify potential conflicts of interest in client representation for [client name]. Please provide a summary of your findings and any recommendations for further action.

  1. Record Billable Hours

Prompt: Record billable hours for [specific task] for [client name]. Please ensure accurate time tracking for billing purposes.

  1. Recognize Potential Legal Issues

Prompt: Recognize potential legal issues in [specific situation] for [client name]. Please provide a summary of your findings and any recommendations for further action.

  1. Organize and Track Case Progress

Prompt: Organize and track case progress and deadlines for [client name]. Please ensure all deadlines are met, and the case progresses as planned.

  1. Gather and Organize Client Information

Prompt: Gather and organize relevant client information for [client name]. Please ensure all necessary information is collected and organized for easy reference.

  1. Manage Appointments and Deadlines

Prompt: Manage appointments, court dates, and deadlines for [client name]. Please ensure all dates are accurate and reminders are in place.

  1. Summarize Witness Statements

Prompt: Summarize witness statements for [specific case] for [client name]. Please provide a clear and concise summary for easy reference.

  1. Compile a List of Exhibits

Prompt: Compile a list of exhibits for trial or hearings for [client name]. Please ensure all necessary presentations are included and labelled correctly.

  1. Summarize Deposition Transcripts

Prompt: Summarize deposition transcripts for [specific legal issue] for [client name]. Please provide a clear and concise summary for easy reference.

  1. Analyze Legal Issues and Provide Conclusions

Prompt: Analyze legal issues and provide conclusions based on the applicable law for [specific situation] for [client name]. Please provide a thorough analysis and recommendations.

  1. Sort and Categorize Legal Documents

Prompt: Sort and categorize legal documents for [client name]. Please ensure all documents are properly labelled and organized for easy reference.

  1. Organize and Compile Documents for Trial

Prompt: Organize and compile documents for trial for [client name]. Please ensure all necessary documents are included and labelled correctly.

  1. Draft Case Update Correspondence

Prompt: Draft emails and letters to clients providing case updates for [client name]. Please ensure the language is professional and the information is accurate.

  1. Write Legal Articles

Prompt: Write articles on legal topics for [company name] blog. Please ensure the pieces are informative and comply with applicable laws and regulations.

  1. Create Discovery Questions

Prompt: Create questions for opposing parties in discovery for [specific legal issue] for [client name]. Please ensure the questions are clear and concise and comply with applicable laws and regulations.

Can ChatGPT replace the need for a professional lawyer?

No, ChatGPT is a powerful tool that can assist lawyers in various tasks, but it cannot substitute for the expertise, judgment, and creativity of a professional lawyer. Lawyers should use ChatGPT as a productivity tool and seek human guidance when dealing with complex legal matters.

How accurate and reliable is ChatGPT's legal information?

ChatGPT's responses are generated based on large datasets and patterns in the text. While it can provide general legal information, it's crucial for lawyers to verify the accuracy and reliability of ChatGPT's outputs by cross-referencing them with authoritative legal sources and consulting professional lawyers when necessary.

What ethical considerations are there for lawyers using ChatGPT?

Lawyers should be mindful of potential ethical and legal implications when using ChatGPT. This includes avoiding plagiarism, maintaining client confidentiality, and adhering to the relevant codes of conduct and regulations in their jurisdiction. Lawyers should use ChatGPT responsibly and with caution.

Can ChatGPT automate complex legal tasks for lawyers?

ChatGPT has the ability to automate certain legal tasks based on text inputs, such as contract drafting or license generation. However, complex legal matters often require human judgment, interpretation, and expertise. Lawyers should consult with professionals when dealing with intricate legal issues that go beyond ChatGPT's capabilities.